Introduction In many cities today, land has become a scarce and valuable resource. As populations grow and urban centers expand, there is increasing pressure to use every available space for housing or commercial...
Faglig kvalitetssikret av lærere og toppstudenter · Følger læreplanen (LK20) · Sist oppdatert 2026-09-07
This guide explores whether public parks should be replaced by residential or business development, providing a detailed model essay and an examiner's analysis of how to structure a high-scoring argument for your English exam.
In many cities today, land has become a scarce and valuable resource. As populations grow and urban centers expand, there is increasing pressure to use every available space for housing or commercial purposes. Some people argue that public parks occupy land that could be more profitably developed into residential areas or business districts. Others, however,believe that parks are essential for public health, social life, and environmental balance. This essay will argue that although urban development is important, preserving public parks is far more beneficial to individuals and communities in the long run.
Supporters of converting parks into housing or business areas often highlight economic necessity and population growth. In large cities such as London, New York, or Tokyo, the demand for housing has outpaced supply, leading to skyrocketing prices and overcrowded neighborhoods. Using parkland for residential development could help solve housing shortages and make cities more affordable. Similarly, constructing business centers or shopping districts can stimulate local economies, attract investors, and create jobs. For many governments, these projects promise immediate financial gains and contribute to overall urban modernization.
Despite these arguments, public parks provide vital benefits that cannot be replaced by buildings or profit. Green spaces are essential for both physical and mental health. They give people a place to exercise, relax, and escape from the stress of urban life. Studies have shown that people who live near parks have lower rates of depression, anxiety, and obesity. Moreover, parks act as communal spaces that foster social interaction and strengthen community bonds. In dense urban environments, where people often feel isolated, access to nature can significantly improve quality of life. This raises questions about whether public health is a government or individual responsibility, but providing such spaces is clearly a state function. Eliminating parks for short-term economic gain would harm public health and social well-being.
Public parks are also crucial for maintaining urban ecosystems. Trees and plants absorb carbon dioxide, filter pollutants, and produce oxygen, helping to reduce the effects of air pollution and climate change. Parks cool city temperatures, provide habitats for wildlife, and prevent flooding by absorbing excess rainwater. Replacing these green spaces with concrete would increase pollution, worsen heat waves, and make cities less livable. For instance, cities like Singapore and Copenhagen have demonstrated that integrating greenery into urban planning improves air quality and makes communities more sustainable. Therefore, environmental protection should take precedence over short-term construction projects, a debate that touches upon the core question of who is responsible for protecting the environment.
Parks also have cultural and economic value beyond their environmental role. Famous parks such as Central Park in New York or Hyde Park in London are iconic landmarks that attract millions of tourists each year. They enhance a city’s image, contribute to local economies, and reflect civic pride. Furthermore, well-maintained green spaces increase property values in surrounding areas, benefiting local homeowners and businesses. This can, however, have a dual effect, sometimes contributing to gentrification which can strain the fabric of local communities by pushing out long-term residents. Instead of removing parks, governments could invest in maintaining them and integrating them with urban projects, creating eco-friendly developments that combine nature and innovation.
The debate over parks versus development does not have to be an either–or issue. Governments and city planners can find balanced solutions that allow for both housing growth and environmental preservation. For example, vertical housing projects and rooftop gardens can provide more living space without destroying parks. Similarly, brownfield redevelopment—repurposing unused industrial land—can meet construction needs without sacrificing green areas. Urban design should focus on long-term livability, not just immediate profit.
In conclusion, while the demand for housing and economic growth is undeniable, public parks play an irreplaceable role in maintaining the health, happiness, and environmental stability of cities. Replacing them with buildings may bring temporary financial gain but would cause long-term social and ecological harm. Parks are not wasted space—they are vital public resources that sustain both people and the planet. A truly modern city is not defined by how many skyscrapers it has, but by how well it balances progress with the preservation of nature.
The question of whether public parks should be replaced by development is a classic example of a societal dilemma often presented in English exams. This topic tests your ability to write a structured argumentative or discussion essay. Examiners use such prompts to assess your capacity to understand a complex issue with valid points on both sides, formulate a clear thesis, and support it with logical arguments and evidence. For instance, a past exam question might be: "Rapid urbanization puts pressure on green spaces. To what extent do you agree that economic development should take precedence over preserving public parks?" This requires you to weigh economic arguments against social and environmental ones. Mastering this type of essay demonstrates critical thinking and language proficiency, key skills for achieving a high grade in the English subject.
Understanding the vocabulary associated with urban planning and environmental science will elevate your analysis. These terms allow you to articulate your arguments with greater precision and academic weight.
| Concept | Definition | Example in context |
|---|---|---|
| Urban Sprawl | The uncontrolled expansion of urban areas into surrounding countryside, often characterized by low-density, car-dependent communities. | "Proponents of developing parks argue it prevents urban sprawl by increasing density within the city, but critics fear it simply replaces one type of environmental loss with another." |
| Sustainable Urban Development | City planning that aims to meet the needs of the present without compromising the ability of future generations to meet their own needs. It integrates social, economic, and environmental goals. | "Instead of removing parks, cities should focus on sustainable urban development, such as building eco-friendly high-rises on previously developed 'brownfield' sites." |
| Ecosystem Services | The benefits that humans receive from ecosystems. In the context of parks, these include air and water purification, climate regulation, and pollination. | "The economic argument for development often overlooks the immense, free value of ecosystem services that a park provides, from flood control to improved public health." |
| Urban Heat Island Effect | The phenomenon where metropolitan areas are significantly warmer than their surrounding rural areas due to human activities and materials like concrete and asphalt absorbing heat. | "Replacing a park's vegetation with heat-absorbing buildings and pavement directly contributes to the urban heat island effect, raising summer temperatures and energy costs." |
| Gentrification | The process whereby the character of a poor urban area is changed by wealthier people moving in, improving housing, and attracting new businesses, often displacing current inhabitants. | "While investing in parks can boost local well-being, it can also trigger gentrification, raising property values and making the area unaffordable for long-time residents." |
Writing a convincing argumentative essay requires avoiding common traps that weaken your position. Here are four frequent mistakes and how to correct them. …