Introduction In many cities today, land has become a scarce and valuable resource. As populations grow and urban centers expand, there is increasing pressure to use every available space for housing or commercial...
Faglig kvalitetssikret av lærere og toppstudenter · Følger læreplanen (LK20) · Sist oppdatert 2026-07-23
This guide explores whether public parks should be replaced by residential or business development, providing a detailed model essay and an examiner's analysis of how to structure a high-scoring argument for your English exam.
Introduction
In many cities today, land has become a scarce and valuable resource. As populations grow and urban centers expand, there is increasing pressure to use every available space for housing or commercial purposes. Some people argue that public parks occupy land that could be more profitably developed into residential areas or business districts. Others, however,believe that parks are essential for public health, social life, and environmental balance. This essay will argue that although urban development is important, preserving public parks is far more beneficial to individuals and communities in the long run.
Body Paragraph 1 – The Case for Replacing Parks with Development
Supporters of converting parks into housing or business areas often highlight economic necessity and population growth. In large cities such as London, New York, or Tokyo, the demand for housing has outpaced supply, leading to skyrocketing prices and overcrowded neighborhoods. Using parkland for residential development could help solve housing shortages and make cities more affordable. Similarly, constructing business centers or shopping districts can stimulate local economies, attract investors, and create jobs. For many governments, these projects promise immediate financial gains and contribute to overall urban modernization. …