Introduction The question of who is responsible for maintaining public health — governments or individuals — has been debated for decades. Some believe that the government must ensure citizens’ health through policies,...
Faglig kvalitetssikret av lærere og toppstudenter · Følger læreplanen (LK20) · Sist oppdatert 2026-09-06
Understanding the debate around public health responsibility is crucial for developing a nuanced argument in a discussion essay. This article will provide a detailed analysis of both governmental and individual roles, offering concrete examples and expert guidance to help you write a top-grade response.
This comprehensive guide delves into the complex question of who holds the primary responsibility for public health: governments or individuals. We will explore arguments supporting both perspectives, drawing on real-world examples and established public health concepts. By understanding the interplay between policy, societal structures, and personal choices, you will be equipped to construct a well-reasoned and articulate essay for your English exams, particularly those focused on analytical and argumentative writing skills.
The question of who is responsible for maintaining public health — governments or individuals — has been debated for decades. Some believe that the government must ensure citizens’ health through policies, laws, and healthcare systems, while others argue that individuals should take full responsibility for their own well-being through personal choices. This essay will examine both perspectives before concluding that health should be a shared responsibility between individuals and the state.
Those who believe that the government is responsible for public health argue that it has the authority and resources to implement large-scale changes. Governments can promote healthy lifestyles through public campaigns, regulate industries that affect health, and provide affordable medical care. For example, banning smoking in public areas, restricting junk food advertising, and ensuring access to vaccinations have all proven effective in improving national health. A concrete instance is the UK's Soft Drinks Industry Levy, introduced in 2018, which incentivised companies to reduce sugar content, thereby altering the consumer environment on a massive scale. The World Health Organization reinforces this view, stating that "Health is a political choice," implying that the structural decisions made by governments are fundamental to population health outcomes.
Furthermore, governments can address structural causes of poor health such as poverty, pollution, and lack of education — issues that individuals cannot control alone. These factors, known as the social determinants of health, create significant health disparities between different societal groups. For example, an individual living in a "food desert"—an urban area where affordable and nutritious food is difficult to obtain—faces systemic barriers to a healthy diet that personal willpower alone cannot overcome. By investing in healthcare infrastructure and preventive programs, governments ensure that every citizen has equal access to health services regardless of income or social class, upholding health as a human right rather than a consumer good. A clear parallel can be seen in debates over whether governments or individuals are responsible for protecting the environment, where systemic issues often outweigh personal actions.
Governmental responsibility also extends to crisis management, such as during pandemics. In these situations, only governments possess the capacity to coordinate nationwide testing, contact tracing, vaccine distribution, and implement public safety measures like lockdowns or travel restrictions. This collective action protects the entire population, demonstrating a fundamental governmental duty to safeguard its citizens' health.
On the other hand, many argue that health ultimately depends on personal choices. Individuals decide what to eat, whether to exercise, and how to manage stress. Even the best healthcare system cannot help people who continue to lead unhealthy lifestyles. For instance, smoking, excessive drinking, and overeating are often personal habits that lead to preventable, non-communicable diseases like cancer, cirrhosis, and heart failure. The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) notes that lifestyle choices are a primary factor in many of the leading causes of death. This perspective champions individual autonomy and self-reliance.
Proponents of this view also believe that if people take responsibility for their own health, they will reduce pressure on public healthcare systems. Encouraging self-care fosters independence, discipline, and awareness about the consequences of one’s actions. This argument suggests that a society composed of health-conscious individuals is more resilient and economically productive. The debate is not dissimilar to discussions on whether governments should make decisions about people's lifestyle in other areas, such as employment or personal finance, where personal agency is highly valued.
Furthermore, the concept of individual freedom dictates that competent adults should be free to make their own choices, even if those choices are perceived as unhealthy by others. Imposing strict governmental controls on personal habits could be seen as an infringement on civil liberties. Many believe that education and awareness campaigns are preferable to restrictive laws, allowing individuals to make informed decisions for themselves.
In reality, public health depends on both individual and governmental action. Governments can create environments that make healthy choices easier — such as providing bike lanes, parks, and healthy school meals — but individuals must still take advantage of these opportunities. For example, even if a city builds gyms or walking trails, they will not be useful unless citizens actively choose to use them. This concept is often described as making the healthy choice the easy choice. An "obesogenic environment," one that passively promotes weight gain, can only be reshaped through a combination of top-down policy (e.g., zoning laws that allow farmers' markets) and bottom-up individual action (e.g., choosing to shop at them).
This shared model ensures sustainability: governments guide and support, while individuals commit and participate. Without cooperation between both sides, efforts to improve public health will remain incomplete. A government might subsidise fruits and vegetables, but individuals must decide to buy and eat them. A school might teach comprehensive health education, but parents reinforce or undermine those lessons at home, raising questions like whether parents should be responsible for their children's obesity.
Countries with the healthiest populations, such as Japan and Sweden, demonstrate the effectiveness of shared responsibility. In these nations, the government enforces strict food safety standards and promotes preventive care, while citizens maintain active lifestyles and balanced diets. In Japan, the "Metabo Law" requires adults aged 40-74 to have annual waist measurements, backed by government-supported health guidance for those at risk. This is coupled with a strong cultural emphasis on a balanced, traditional diet. In Sweden, universal healthcare is complemented by a strong outdoor culture ('friluftsliv') and urban planning that facilitates walking and cycling. A third example is Singapore's "Health Promotion Board," a government agency that runs nationwide physical activity campaigns and offers financial incentives for healthy behaviors, directly supporting individuals in their health journey.
This partnership between policy and personal action leads to lower rates of obesity, longer life expectancy, and stronger public health systems overall. These examples highlight that a truly healthy society emerges when an enabling environment is combined with informed and proactive individual engagement.
In conclusion, both the government and individuals play essential roles in maintaining public health. While the government provides infrastructure, education, and regulation, individuals must make responsible lifestyle choices. A healthy society is built when both sides work together — the government creates the conditions for well-being, and citizens take responsibility for living wisely within them.
This "discuss both views" format is a classic task in English written exams for VG1–VG3. It tests your ability to analyse a complex issue from multiple perspectives, structure a balanced argument, and articulate a well-founded personal opinion. Examiners want to see that you can move beyond a simple pro-con list and engage with the nuances of the topic.
Here are some ways this topic could appear: …