A strong comparison keeps the question constant while showing how different texts construct the same issue through different mechanisms.
Faglig kvalitetssikret av lærere og toppstudenter · Følger læreplanen (LK20) · Sist oppdatert 2026-09-14
Learning goal
Compare texts through a shared analytical dimension rather than writing two separate mini-essays.
How to read this model
- Choose one dimension.
- Collect matched evidence from both texts.
- Explain each mechanism.
- State the important difference.
- Draw the comparative inference.
Steps in the model
- Shared dimension – Surveillance · mobility · belonging · language · performance · identity.
- Text A evidence – Specific pattern and mechanism.
- Text B evidence – Specific pattern and mechanism on the same dimension.
- Key difference – How do form, context, power structure or technique change the treatment?
- Comparative significance – What does the difference reveal about the shared issue?
Explanation
Controlled dimensions prevent comparison from becoming A-then-B description.
The matrix is transferable across American Dream, dystopian, post-colonial, Shakespeare and Gothic texts.
Examples
- Compare surveillance with surveillance, not plot summary with historical context.
- A comparison can show similarity in issue but difference in mechanism or judgement.
For the exam
Write comparison sentences throughout the paragraph instead of postponing comparison until the final sentence.